The Real AI Bubble: How NVIDIA, Microsoft, OpenAI, Google, Oracle — and Now AMD — Shape the Future of Compute
The global AI boom is driven by unprecedented demand for computing power. But beneath the hype lies a complex ecosystem of tech giants, GPU suppliers, AI labs, and cloud providers, all feeding into a feedback loop that many analysts now describe as an AI bubble.
In this post, we map the entire system — including AMD, which has recently entered the spotlight as the strongest challenger to NVIDIA’s dominance.
🌐 1. The Core AI Bubble Loop (2023–2025)
The modern AI race is powered by a simple but explosive feedback cycle:
AI Labs → Need More Compute → Cloud Providers Buy GPUs → NVIDIA Supplies GPUs →
NVIDIA Valuation Rises → AI Labs Raise More Money → Repeat
This loop has created the largest technology capex boom in history.
The Loop Components:
- AI Labs: OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, Meta
- Cloud Providers: Microsoft Azure, AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud
- GPU Supplier: NVIDIA
- Bubble Catalyst: Increasing model size and compute demand
Every new model (GPT-4 → GPT-5 → GPT-next) multiplies compute demand by 2–10×, pushing the bubble further.
🟦 2. NVIDIA: The Center of the AI Bubble
NVIDIA sits at the heart of the boom. It supplies:
- H100
- H200
- B100
- GB200
- And the CUDA ecosystem (the true moat)
NVIDIA enjoys:
- ~95% market share in AI accelerators
- Record-breaking margins
- Unmatched demand backlog
- Dependency from every frontier AI lab
NVIDIA = Bubble King.
🟧 3. Microsoft: The Bubble Amplifier
Microsoft amplified the bubble by:
- Investing >$13B into OpenAI
- Running nearly all OpenAI workloads on Azure
- Buying massive GPU inventory from NVIDIA
- Building “AI factories” worldwide
- Launching its own Maia AI chips
Microsoft is both driver and beneficiary of the cycle.
🔵 4. OpenAI: The Bubble Engine
OpenAI ignites the cycle by demanding:
- Larger GPU clusters
- Faster interconnects
- More global compute
Training GPT-4 and GPT-5 requires tens of thousands of NVIDIA GPUs, pushing cloud and hardware demand into extreme territory.
🟩 5. Google: The Vertical Integrator (Not in the Bubble Loop)
Google is a major AI player but does not participate in the NVIDIA bubble.
Why?
It built an independent stack:
- TPU chips (v4, v5e, v6e)
- Google DeepMind research
- Gemini model family
- Google-owned datacenters
Google buys far fewer NVIDIA GPUs, avoiding the boom-bust cycle.
Google is an AI leader, but not a bubble driver.
🟥 6. Oracle: The Unexpected Winner
Oracle Cloud (OCI) became an AI boom winner because:
- It offered cheaper GPU clusters
- It partnered with xAI, Cohere, Adept
- It aggressively bought thousands of H100 GPUs
Oracle moved from legacy database company → AI infrastructure powerhouse.
🟪 7. AMD: The Bubble Challenger
Now we add AMD, the company everyone is watching.
💥 AMD is the only realistic challenger to NVIDIA’s monopoly.
Recent AMD AI GPUs:
- MI300X
- MI325X
- Upcoming MI350 (2026)
- ROCm 6.0 (CUDA competitor)
Why AMD matters:
-
Major cloud providers are integrating MI300X:
- AWS (partial)
- Azure (pilot deployment)
- Oracle Cloud (growing adoption)
- AMD enables lower training and inference cost
- Strong alternative for enterprises sensitive to GPU pricing
But AMD is not yet part of the bubble:
Training major models still uses NVIDIA, because:
- CUDA is still dominant
- ROCm ecosystem is young
- AI labs have not migrated
AMD = Bubble Challenger, not Bubble Driver (yet).
🟦 Updated AI Bubble Ecosystem Map (Including AMD)
AI Labs
(OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, Meta, Cohere)
▲
│ Needs massive compute
│
┌───────────────┴───────────────┐
│ Cloud Providers │
│ (Microsoft, AWS, Oracle, GCP) │
└───────────────▲───────────────┘
│ Buy GPUs at scale
│
┌─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┐
│ NVIDIA │
│ (AI Bubble Center, CUDA moat) │
└─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘
│
┌──────────────────┴──────────────────┐
│ AMD │
│ (Challenger, MI300X ecosystem) │
└──────────────────────────────────────┘
⭐ Summary: Who is Driving the AI Bubble?
🟦 Bubble Center
- NVIDIA
🟧 Bubble Drivers
- Microsoft
- Amazon
- Meta
- Oracle
- Tesla / xAI
- Anthropic
🟥 Bubble Engines
- OpenAI
- Anthropic
- xAI
🟩 Not in Bubble Loop
- Google (TPU strategy)
- Apple (local AI, minimal GPU usage)
🟪 Bubble Followers / Challengers
- AMD ← important new player
- Intel
- Groq
- Cerebras
- SambaNova
- CoreWeave / Lambda Labs
📌 Final Thoughts
The AI bubble is not simply about “AI hype”.
It is specifically about GPU demand, compute inflation, and AI training scale.
NVIDIA dominates today, but AMD is finally entering the game.
If AMD’s MI300X + ROCm ecosystem catches up, the market may shift from:
- Single-supplier monopoly → dual-supplier competition
This could:
- Lower training costs
- Slow down NVIDIA’s valuation explosion
- Reshape cloud AI strategies
The next 12–24 months will decide whether AMD becomes a true AI giant or remains a challenger.
Get in Touch with us
Related Posts
- AI驱动的医院信息系统纵向整合(Vertical Integration)
- How AI Enables Vertical Integration of Hospital Systems
- 工业AI系统中的AI加速器 为什么“软件框架”比“芯片性能”更重要
- AI Accelerators in Industrial AI Systems: Why Software Frameworks Matter More Than Chips
- 面向中国企业的系统开发:以 AI + 工作流安全集成电商与 ERP
- Global-Ready System Development for EC–ERP Integration with AI & Workflow
- 不可靠的“智能”系统所隐藏的真实成本
- The Hidden Cost of ‘Smart’ Systems That Don’t Work Reliably
- GPU vs LPU vs TPU:如何选择合适的 AI 加速器
- GPU vs LPU vs TPU: Choosing the Right AI Accelerator
- 什么是 LPU?面向中国企业的实践性解析与应用场景
- What Is an LPU? A Practical Introduction and Real‑World Applications
- 面向软件工程师的网络安全术语对照表
- Cybersecurity Terms Explained for Software Developers
- 现代网络安全监控与事件响应系统设计 基于 Wazuh、SOAR 与威胁情报的可落地架构实践
- Building a Modern Cybersecurity Monitoring & Response System. A Practical Architecture Using Wazuh, SOAR, and Threat Intelligence
- AI 时代的经典编程思想
- Classic Programming Concepts in the Age of AI
- SimpliPOSFlex. 面向真实作业现场的 POS 系统(中国市场版)
- SimpliPOSFlex. The POS Designed for Businesses Where Reality Matters













